Is hybrid rice the answer?
Glenn B. Gregorio, g.gregorio@cgiar.org, IRRI
The recent scarcity of rice and steep rise in price underline the need to accelerate the introduction and adoption of higher yielding varieties. This starts from having good seeds or varieties. Once a good variety is born, technology and business can work together to raise production.
The appetite for rice has continuously increased in Africa, with imports accounting for almost one-third of the total world trade in rice. Imports have increased over time as rice production grows far more slowly than total demand. It is expected that demand from Africa will continue to grow unless unchecked.

Glenn Gregorio checks the growth of hybrid rice plants, IRRI-WARDA nurseries. Photo by IITA
Is hybrid technology the answer to Africa’s rice woes? Is it worth trying? Although hybrid rice has succeeded in Asia, starting in temperate China and recently in tropical countries, sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are still skeptical about trying these so-called “smart seeds”. Yield data from six Chinese hybrid rice varieties obtained in Guinea last 2003 demonstrated a stunning 9.2 t/ha for the highest yielding hybrid, which is three to six times higher than the yield of local cultivars. However, this first hybrid rice tested in SSA was nonreplicated, with extremely high application of fertilizer (160 kg N, 70 kg P, 70 kg K) and no local variety was included in the trial. Nonetheless, it shows the enormous potential of hybrid rice in Africa.
Using tropical hybrid rice from International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), the first replicated yield trial was conducted at the Africa Rice Center (WARDA) station, Ibadan, in the 2008 wet season. Twenty-two tropical hybrid rice varieties were tested along with WITA 4—the most popular high-yielding variety in Nigeria—as the local check. Moderate levels of fertilizer (65 kg N, 18 kg P, 18 kg K) and standard cultural crop management practices were applied.
While we were conducting the trial, we received inquiries about the feasibility of growing hybrid rice in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Guinea. Everyone was excited to learn that tropical hybrids were being tested in the IITA farm. The result of this trial could be the basis for justifying investment in hybrid rice research in SSA.
Some hybrids showed yields that were 0.9-1.3 t/ha higher (20-28%) than the local variety under the same crop management. This is good news because to make hybrid rice attractive and acceptable it must have a yield advantage of at least 15-20% over the highest nonhybrid variety. The not-so-good news is that, only two hybrids yielded significantly more than WITA-4. A large number showed poor performance under local conditions since these hybrids were not developed in Africa. The highest yielding hybrid rice yielded less than those tested in Guinea because of the very low fertilizer rate (only 40% of that applied in the Guinea hybrid trial).

Girl with her precious rice harvest, Ogun State, Nigeria. Photo by G. Gregorio
This pioneering hybrid rice trial in Nigeria demonstrated that hybrid rice may be the answer to the need to increase rice productivity in SSA. However, creating hybrid rice varieties adapted to local conditions is a challenging process, especially when it comes to hybrid rice seed production. Moreover, the lack of technical skills and infrastructure to carry out hybrid rice seed production programs is a serious constraint.
Hybrid rice development is like a horse race: unless you start, you can never hope to finish the race. Now we have the evidence that hybrid rice technology might work in SSA as it did in Asia. Could this be the vehicle for the Green Revolution in Africa?



I like the horserace metaphor but doubt that one should speak about a Green Revolution in Africa. From my school days I learned that genetic improvement works best when other production and management factors be it soil-fertility, crop-rotation, water-managements are in place. The mention of “under same crop management” in a research station is too simple an explanation of variable factors including human bias. Real field conditions may give a complete different result. There’s also no mention of the actual size of each field planted with a variety and I doubt the generalizations to tons/ha, etc. The absence of real statistics, especially related to variability and significance give me the impression of too much advocacy for hybrid rice based on experiences in Asia rather than applying something new to the particulars of Africa. Despite my critical review of your article and promotion of technology I would like to say that I admire the work done by Centers such as ILRI, IITA and Warda and that I strongly believe in research based development as a panacea to underlying, long-term problems. I hope that agricultural research remains focussed on longer term rather than shorter term donor driven solutions.
Thank you for your comments Johnson. Yes one of the main constraints for rice production in SS Africa is the production management that’s why high yielding varieties including hybrid rice have difficulty is spreading. We at IRRI and WARDA are working more on other technologies in SSA than hybrid rice which can be shown in our websites. We are just showing this first hybrid rice testing in Nigeria and it demonstrated its potential. The methodology of same crop management means that the nonhybrid was treated same way as the hybrids in term of cultural practices for us to compare their yields. The actual harvested area was 9.6 meter square after discarding the border rows and the LSD5% is 0.68t/ha with cv of 9.2. These technical information were not shown in this article but it will be shown in the scientific publication soon. This is the first experiment we have done on hybrid rice in SSA and we have not done any advocacy yet. In summary, IRRI and WARDA demonstrated that hybrid rice has the potential in SSA and this may justify the start of hybrid rice research in SSA along with other appropriate technology. Yes it’s like a horse race, if we will not start now and wait for all things to be in place then we will be late.
This is a great job. I admire the work done by centers such as ILRI, IITA, and AfricaRice (Warda) and I strongly believe in research-based development as well, but my problem or concern is the impact of such research on the rice user sectors, i.e., industrial sectors using rice. Thank you.
Leave your response!
Features »
Amazing maize: Investment in agricultural research pays off
IITA researchers have shown that investment in agricultural research is paying off: the generation and diffusion of modern maize varieties in the last three decades have lifted more than 1 million people in sub-Saharan Africa out of poverty in the last 10 years.
Best Practice »
Impact of cassava R4D on smallholder farmers
A series of impact studies in Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo provides evidence that IITA’s R4D work does have an impact on small-scale farmers.
Tool Box »
Funding agricultural R&D and meeting the MDG target
Member countries of ECOWAS will need to significantly increase their investment in agricultural research and development to achieve the MDG aim of eradicating extreme hunger and poverty by 2015.
Who's Who »
Hartmann: Social science is crucial
On 31 October 2011, Dr Hartmann completed his tenure as the sixth Director General of IITA. In this interview, Hartmann shares his experience on his 10-year stay at IITA.
Looking In »
Akin Adesina: Making agriculture work for farmers
Nigeria’s Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Dr Akin Adesina, talks about his strategy for a Green Revolution in Nigeria.
Frontiers »
Transgenic banana for Africa
Molecular geneticist Leena Tripathi provides an update on a collaborative work to develop a high-value product—the transgenic banana.
Archives
Tags
aflatoxin Africa African agriculture Agriculture banana Benin biocontrol biodiversity biodiversity conservation biological control biosafety biotechnology black-eyed peas Cassava cassava brown streak disease CBSD CGIAR climate change CMD conservation cowpea food security Genetic Resources Center germplasm health GMO IITA impact insects International Institute of Tropical Agriculture International Year of Biodiversity maize natural resources management Nigeria NRM partnership pests and diseases plantain plant health R4D R4D Review Research for Development social science Tissue Culture uganda yamRecent Posts
Most Commented
Most Viewed