Is genetically modified cowpea safe?
Genetically modified cowpea resistant to the cowpea pod borer (Maruca vitrata) will soon become a reality. This transgenic cowpea contains the gene from the soil microbe Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) that is toxic to the pests. But before that happens, IITA is making sure that it addresses some of the potential risks associated with using such genetically modified organisms (GMO).

Typical damage by pod borer caterpillar. Photo by M. Tamo, IITA
IITA started preliminary studies to assess concerns, including the development of resistance by the target insect pest to the insecticidal protein expressed in the plant, negative effects of the insecticidal protein on nontarget organisms present in the same agroecosystem, such as natural enemies or pollinators, the accidental introduction of the gene expressing the toxic protein into wild relatives of cowpea (referred to as “gene flow”), and negative effects on human and animal health.
In the meantime, a team of scientists headed by Dr T.J. Higgins of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia, was able to transform cowpea successfully with the Bt toxin-expressing gene. The transgenic plant has been tested in Puerto Rico and is not yet available for testing in Africa.

Parasitic wasp, Phanerotoma leucobasis, laying egg into egg of pod borer. Photo by M. Tamo, IITA
IITA started evaluating some of the unintended effects of the purified Bt-toxin on nontarget organisms, focusing on natural enemies of the target insect pest, the caterpillar of the pod borer (M. vitrata).
In our first case study, we used a locally available natural enemy, a small parasitic wasp called Phanerotoma leucobasis, which develops by destroying caterpillars of the cowpea pod borer. This wasp has a curious biology because it can insert its small egg into the bigger egg of the pod borer, but its immature stages develop inside the caterpillar only when it starts feeding on the cowpea plant. It destroys the pod borer’s internal organs from the inside, ultimately killing it.
Following standard protocols in collaboration with Purdue University, USA, we first determined the lethal dosage of the Bt-toxin that could kill 50% and 95% of the young caterpillars. Subsequently, we let the wasp parasitize the eggs of the pod borer, and transferred the hatching caterpillars onto an artificial rearing diet contaminated with different doses of the toxin to let them feed on it.

Exotic parasitic wasp Apanteles taragamae. Photo by G. Georgen, IITA
The level of wasp mortality recorded in this experiment favorably compares with results obtained in other studies, and is primarily due to the death of the host caterpillar while feeding on the contaminated diet. Similar experiments are ongoing, using another natural enemy of the pod borer, the exotic parasitic wasp Apanteles taragamae introduced into our laboratories from the World Vegetable Center (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center) in Taiwan.
What would then be the likely impact of Bt cowpea on these natural enemies in the field?
For now, we know from previous studies (Romeis et al. 2006) that the negative, unintended effects of Bt-transformed crops such as corn and cotton on natural enemies and biodiversity at large are far less than those caused by repeated applications of synthetic pesticides to control the same pests under conventional crop protection schemes. For the cowpea pod borer, several alternative host plants exist in the wild where the pest is exposed to the attacks of natural enemies throughout the year, hence providing natural refugia and thus avoiding being negatively impacted by the Bt-toxin present in the transformed cowpea.
Reference
Romeis, J., M. Meissle, and F. Bigler. 2006. Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nature Biotechnology. 24:1. p 63-71. January. www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology


Interesting! I believe in using science and its tools for the betterment of humanity, such as in producing more food and jobs, but I am not totally convinced by the author’s argument. So how safe is GMO cowpea really?
we are left with no option with the current food needs coupled with the pest problems . Africa must grow and eat GMO’s
Thanks for your question, Cry1Ab is one of the most-studied insect endotoxins used for transgenic crops. In our article we did not mention specifically toxicity studies which were conducted in the US or Europe before Cry1Ab transformed crops could get the green light by regulatory authorities, as we did not participate in those studies. However, I give you below just a few useful links illustrating which kind of studies were conducted to ascertain its innocuity to mammals and environment in general.
http://www.isaaa.org/kc
http://www.agbios.com/cstudies.php?book=FSA&ev=MON810&chapter=Toxicity&lang=
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/cs/BlobServer/Scientific_Opinion/gmo_opinion_ej213_bt11maize_cultivation_summary_en1.pdf?ssbinary=true
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=18325653
http://www.isaaa.org/Kc/inforesources/publications/pocketk/Doc-Pocket_K35.pdf
There are possible effects of GM cowpea on the Eco system and I think IITA on that note should do a proper Evaluaton on the various members of the Eco system before the release of this variety
Leave your response!
Features »
Amazing maize: Investment in agricultural research pays off
IITA researchers have shown that investment in agricultural research is paying off: the generation and diffusion of modern maize varieties in the last three decades have lifted more than 1 million people in sub-Saharan Africa out of poverty in the last 10 years.
Best Practice »
Impact of cassava R4D on smallholder farmers
A series of impact studies in Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo provides evidence that IITA’s R4D work does have an impact on small-scale farmers.
Tool Box »
Funding agricultural R&D and meeting the MDG target
Member countries of ECOWAS will need to significantly increase their investment in agricultural research and development to achieve the MDG aim of eradicating extreme hunger and poverty by 2015.
Who's Who »
Hartmann: Social science is crucial
On 31 October 2011, Dr Hartmann completed his tenure as the sixth Director General of IITA. In this interview, Hartmann shares his experience on his 10-year stay at IITA.
Looking In »
Akin Adesina: Making agriculture work for farmers
Nigeria’s Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Dr Akin Adesina, talks about his strategy for a Green Revolution in Nigeria.
Frontiers »
Transgenic banana for Africa
Molecular geneticist Leena Tripathi provides an update on a collaborative work to develop a high-value product—the transgenic banana.
Archives
Tags
aflatoxin Africa African agriculture Agriculture banana Benin biocontrol biodiversity biodiversity conservation biological control biosafety biotechnology black-eyed peas Cassava cassava brown streak disease CBSD CGIAR climate change CMD conservation cowpea food security Genetic Resources Center germplasm health GMO IITA impact insects International Institute of Tropical Agriculture International Year of Biodiversity maize natural resources management Nigeria NRM partnership pests and diseases plantain plant health R4D R4D Review Research for Development social science Tissue Culture uganda yamRecent Posts
Most Commented
Most Viewed