Organic bananas from Africa?
Organic agriculture provides significant market opportunities for commercial agriculture globally.
Organic food markets grew at tremendous rates during the 1990s, encouraging organic food production throughout the world. Although this growth rate has slowed down a bit, and the niche market for organic food is less than 4% of the European or North American food markets, the prospects of high prices and a stable demand still make organic food markets attractive for producers.
Commercial and certified organic farming is not uncommon in Africa that has 19% of the world’s organic farms. Main organic products include fruits and vegetables, cotton, coffee, tea, and herbs and spices.
Bananas are the most widely traded fruits worldwide. Recent trends in organic food demand in developed countries have made organic bananas an attractive crop in developing countries. In fact, trade in organic bananas increased during the late 1990s and early 2000s at a quite significant rate, from about 30,000 tons in 1998 to about 150,000 tons in 2003. Even so, organic bananas represent only a small share (1%) in the world banana trade.
About two-thirds of the organic bananas are traded to the European Union (EU), where they constitute about 2.5% of the banana market, a significantly larger percentage than on the world market. The other main target is North America, and, to a much lesser extent, Japan.
The entire trade in organic bananas comes from countries in Latin America. Africa and Asia are geographically closer to the EU and Japan but this does not seem to be relevant to organic banana trade.
Conventionally grown bananas are mainly traded from Latin America onto the world market, with minor shares coming from West and Central Africa (WCA) and Asia. North America sources its banana supply exclusively from Latin America. Europe imports bananas from Latin America, WCA (Côte d’Ivoire and Cameroon). Japan imports bananas from Latin America and Asia (Philippines and China).
East and Central Africa—in particular Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi, as one of the largest banana-producing regions worldwide—does not feature to any significant extent in these statistics.
Suppliers of organic bananas are basically the same as those of conventional bananas, Latin American countries. Organic banana production and trade follow conventional production and trade, with suppliers such as the African or Asian producers lagging behind.
Although this is a large market, bananas, in particular conventionally grown bananas, seem to have had the peak of their market growth during the 1990s. Significant volume growth is expected to occur only in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Elsewhere, volume growths are expected only to follow population developments, to a lesser extent increases in income and falling prices. While volume growths reached on average 4% in the 90s, they will reach only about 2.5% annually until 2010. Prices are expected to decline with increased liberalization of banana markets, in particular the EU. Overall, markets are considered saturated.
Africa has not been able to take up production and trade opportunities on the global banana market, with a few exceptions such as Cameroon and Côte d’Ivoire. However, more recently, there are efforts under way to try and enter the global banana markets in both the conventional and niche segments.
Conventionally grown banana production in Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi is hardly competitive with that from other regions because of its small scale and low-input production. These lead to relatively low yields and consequently high production costs. Scattered small-scale production makes assembly and packaging a long and costly effort, with high postharvest losses as a consequence.
Transport routes are long and road and sea transport to possible final destinations often take longer than the shelf-life of bananas, so that the freight will decay before reaching markets in Europe or Asia.
Consequently, the only exports of conventionally grown bananas from East Africa to Europe go by airfreight, often as by-cargo with higher value products. In Europe they supply only specialty markets, such as cooking bananas or plantain for African expatriates, who do not make up a significant market share. The problem can be quantified by comparing production and trade costs of conventionally grown bananas from Latin America and Uganda (Table 1).
The reasons for Uganda’s disadvantages on the European market are obvious: High raw material costs. Land and labor-intensive small-scale production, losses from pests and diseases, and the lack of fertilizer already affect primary production adversely. Gathering, packaging, and transport from the small farms through many intermediaries impose a large amount of additional costs.
The transport of the material to the seaports (the nearest is Mombasa in Kenya) and the long distance to Europe add further disadvantages. Normally, the distance from production to market in terms of days would exceed even the 20-day shelf-life of fresh bananas.
Organic bananas from Uganda are cheaper at the farmgate than Ecuadorian bananas (Table 1), and although handling costs and airfreight are still high, and the final margins in retail are lower than those from Ecuadorian bananas, there is still a significant profit margin at the retail level. This makes the export of organic bananas from Uganda to the EU by airfreight far more attractive than the export of conventional bananas by sea—if the latter becomes technically possible.
This opportunity should be the same for more Central African countries, such as Rwanda and Burundi, but also for West African countries such as Cameroon and Côte d’Ivoire. What mainly contributes to this opportunity is the high value of organic bananas on the European markets, and the opportunities arising from this to export these high-value fruits to Europe by plane.
However, even if organic bananas (or any other organic fruit or agricultural product) represent an opportunity, some challenges exist which have to be considered. Poor quality and badly maintained roads, vehicles, rail links, and rolling stock all pose problems for transportation. Lack of refrigeration, erratic power supplies, poor communications, underdeveloped banking and credit systems, and, sometimes, political and economic instability, all raise serious and often insuperable problems.
In addition, the lack of local certification bodies imposes significant constraints and risks to organic agriculture in Africa. Certifiers have to be flown in and they increase the costs of organic production. So far, only Tunisia has its own European-standard certification bodies. The costs of certification have to be seen as investment costs and hence risks. If the investment costs are not amortized by the revenues, e.g., in the case of harvest failures or a sudden shortfall of market outlets, investments in certification are lost and hence, the farmers are liable to a significant investment risk. Similar constraints apply to the establishment and sustainability of commercial organic agriculture elsewhere in Africa, and also to the production and trade in organic bananas.
In summary, these constraints are:
• Lack of experience in intensive organic production
• Lack of experience in handling and exporting fresh produce
• Lack of professional management
• Diseconomies of scale in exporting small quantities, e.g., for test exports
• Poor communication between foreign importers and exporters
• Poor negotiation skills and judgment of exporters
• Lack of familiarity with international markets, including knowledge of the organic market place overseas
• Lack of governmental support for exports
Organic banana production has its advantages, in particular for some Central and Eastern African producers, as markets are high value and stable in Europe and the US, while conventional banana markets are stagnating. Yet it is clear that there are a number of prerequisites for entry to the markets. Good marketing linkages and marketing skills for producers and marketers are at the top. Investments in certification have to be facilitated, in particular for small producers or producer groups.
Both physical infrastructure (roads) and political frameworks in Africa have to be favorable if organic production and exports are to be sustainable. Markets, although attractive at the moment, are competitive, probably limited, and probably highly income-elastic and thus sensitive to economic distortions on the demand side. This also means that oversupply has to be avoided and in the long run, cost reduction will be necessary to successfully compete in organic markets.
Sources:
FAO. 2004. Statistical databases. www.fao.org.
Fischer, C. 2004. Demand for bananas in the European Union, with special focus on Germany. Research report, Bonn.
Mwadime, S. 2004. Private sector developments. Paper presented on the conference “Markets to raise incomes for poor farmers in Africa”, organized by the Rockefeller Foundation in Nairobi, Kenya, 5-8 April 2004.
Spilsbury, J., Jagwe, J., Ferris, S. and D. Luwandagga. 2002. Evaluating the market opportunities for banana and its products in the principal banana growing countries of ASARECA, Uganda report. Kampala (IITA/Foodnet).
FAO. 2006. Medium term prospects for agricultural commodities: Bananas. http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y5143e/y5143e10.htm.
FAO/ITC/CTA. 2001. World Markets for Organic Fruit and Vegetables - Opportunities for Developing Countries in the Production and Export of Organic Horticultural Products. International Trade Centre, Technical Centre For Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Rome, Italy. Online at http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y1669e/y1669e00.htm.
Parrott, N. and F. Kalibwani. 2005. “Organic Farming in Africa,” In The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2005. Helga and Yussefi (Eds). International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.
Parrot, N. and van Elzakker, B. 2003. Organic and like-minded movements in Africa. Development and status.- IFOAM.
UNCTAD (2008): Market information in the commodities area: Banana. http://www.unctad.org/infocomm/anglais/banana/market.htm.
Yussefi, M. 2006. “Organic Farming Worldwide 2006: Overview and Main Statistics,” In The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2006. 7th Revised Edition, Willer and Yussefi (Eds). International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.






I’m unqualified to comment, but clearly lots of people are reading this and not doing so, so I may as well start! Nice article, though I’d like to hear more on potential solutions to all these challenges (guess there was limited space here) especially in terms of addressing the problems of “scattered, small-scale production”
Also, what research has been done into the potential market for different types of banana? In Europe you can’t currently buy much besides ‘cavendish’ bananas. Could there be a broader niche there - organic / fairtrade or otherwise?
The success (or failure) of organic bananas from Africa all boils down to consumer preferences. And as a consumer, why would I buy organic bananas from Africa instead of, say, from Asia? Are there added values to it? The article doesn’t really touch on this basic issue. If I am going to put in my hard-earned cash into buying one of these African organic bananas then I expect something extra out of it, otherwise I would just go and pick my usual Cavendish from China.
Loved your insight!! For once someone got everything correct!!
The Government of Burundi imposes restrictions to farmers on growing bananas but not on coffee.
Leave your response!
Features »
Amazing maize: Investment in agricultural research pays off
IITA researchers have shown that investment in agricultural research is paying off: the generation and diffusion of modern maize varieties in the last three decades have lifted more than 1 million people in sub-Saharan Africa out of poverty in the last 10 years.
Best Practice »
Impact of cassava R4D on smallholder farmers
A series of impact studies in Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo provides evidence that IITA’s R4D work does have an impact on small-scale farmers.
Tool Box »
Funding agricultural R&D and meeting the MDG target
Member countries of ECOWAS will need to significantly increase their investment in agricultural research and development to achieve the MDG aim of eradicating extreme hunger and poverty by 2015.
Who's Who »
Hartmann: Social science is crucial
On 31 October 2011, Dr Hartmann completed his tenure as the sixth Director General of IITA. In this interview, Hartmann shares his experience on his 10-year stay at IITA.
Looking In »
Akin Adesina: Making agriculture work for farmers
Nigeria’s Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Dr Akin Adesina, talks about his strategy for a Green Revolution in Nigeria.
Frontiers »
Transgenic banana for Africa
Molecular geneticist Leena Tripathi provides an update on a collaborative work to develop a high-value product—the transgenic banana.
Archives
Tags
aflatoxin Africa African agriculture Agriculture banana Benin biocontrol biodiversity biodiversity conservation biological control biosafety biotechnology black-eyed peas Cassava cassava brown streak disease CBSD CGIAR climate change CMD conservation cowpea food security Genetic Resources Center germplasm health GMO IITA impact insects International Institute of Tropical Agriculture International Year of Biodiversity maize natural resources management Nigeria NRM partnership pests and diseases plantain plant health R4D R4D Review Research for Development social science Tissue Culture uganda yamRecent Posts
Most Commented
Most Viewed